Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the
pastie?
What passes for talent these days really sucks!

Absolutely! Isn't it time that we all state the obvious and tell these
faux
entertainers that we know they all have no talent and resort to sexual
antics on stage to hide that which is all too evident? Whatever
happened to
musicians and singers who actually relied on their talent and creative /
artistic material rather than shock value?

First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is
artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics
on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their
dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get
where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some
people are too narrow minded to understand!

Actually, I don't see what creds are needed to state that which is painfully
obvious. That is, the total so called half time entertainment, as a whole,
was lacking in talent. What we were given in lieu of talent is crotch
grabbing, pelvis humping, verbal sexual innuendo and the now famous bare
breast - all of which would qualify as sexual antics in a performance.
Since you asked, I think these people got where they are through promotion
and marketing by the right people and a willingness to act out blatant
suggestive sexual acts.