"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:
hoary, you got to be too old iffin you no longer care to look at a
bare
breast.
Although.....some are much nicer than
others!
Yup, some are indeed better than others, but never found a bare one
I
didn't
like. [grin]
Too much ado over a breast. What a backwards country this is.
--
Email sent to is never read.
You misunderstand. It's the "ado" over the nearly bare breast on
television I find absurd. I'm not too old to be "titillated," as it
were. Anyone who has traveled any and has tuned in to television in
Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and dozens of other
countries has seen bare female breasts during primetime hours on the
major television stations. It is Americans who are so backwards about
this they flip out when they see tits on TV. It's perfectly ok, though,
to show someone being shot.
--
Email sent to is never read.
I think most of the uproar is over the low class stunt. Draw attention
to
yourselves as you have no real talent. PBS shows bare titties, and not
uproar. Most of the soaps probably come close, and Baywatch etc, were
as
good as showing.
Apparently Bill and I agree that television would be much improved if
more bare female breasts were shown in a high-class fashion.
--
Email sent to is never read.
Janet has apologized for the stunt. Planned. Same as always, all OK now
that a apology was issued. Get caught taking illegal political money, give
it back and say sorry. Maybe it will work with robbing banks also. As to
TV. High class display of boobs will not help TV. The medium is now aimed
at the lower socio stratum of 17-28 year olds. They spend what money they
have, and tune in. Most of the shows are extremely intelligence challenged.
Where is Ed Sullivan with new acts with talent? Star Search was not display
of the hosts bad / obnoxious manners. Look at the New Years shows. Gansta
Nation, rapping about violence. Who are these shows aimed to?