*JimH* wrote:
Thanks for the link Chuck.
I hope you read my apology. Although it happened only after being cornered,
it was sincere. I was cornered and took the wrong road in trying to
explain myself. As a result of that I said things about you that were not
true and were hurtful. I again apologize to you for that. If there is
anything I should do to restore your reputation here I will do whatever is
needed.
I know that a hundred apologies will not make up for my indiscretion but one
more will not hurt.
Very manly of you, Jim.
Thanks.
Response to your apology posted in the pertinent thread.
While I may have been technically correct on the issue in question, I
am not without blame for the manner in which the discussion evolved or
my aggressive pursuit of you into said corner, so an apology in return
is certainly warranted.
Don't worry about my reputation. :-) Being Gould is just like living
life as an onion. Some people really like onions a lot, others can't
stand even the thought that an onion have been within 10-feet of
something they plan to eat, but few folks are without an opinion. It's
OK to be on the "don't like onions" side, really it is.
I'll bury my end of the hatchet, and it can stay buried if we both
elect to leave it alone.
|