Ah so, taking your money is OK in this instance, but not in others
(f'r'instance Social Security taxes)? Your sense of fiscally
responsibile gov't is strangely flexible.


Dave wrote:
Nothing strange about thinking my taxes should pay for some things and that
other things should be paid for by the recipient.

I don't have an argument with that, but I fail to see how it's relevant
in this case.

You seem to be unwilling to face the facts of this proposal, instead
wanting to insult others and say that the facts presented others are
"propaganda" and "empty-headed populist rhetoric."

Here's a suggestion: when you indulge in this kind of discussion, do it
on some of the other newsgroups that are already polluted. Let's try and
keep this one on topic, just a little bit.

DSK