"NOYB" wrote in message
. com...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Have you thought about both reasons why Nookular Boy (meaning
"his
sitters")
might've wanted to give Saddam time to clean up his back yard?


I can think of a reason:
When Saddam sends the weapons to Syria, we can then blast the hell
out
of
Syria.


Yes. Syria. Another major threat to the U.S. Idiot.

Doug,
I'm not sure what has happened to you, but you're beginning to descend
to
name-calling, foul-mouthed depths of the basskisser.

OK. I'm sorry. I'll switch to a method gleaned from all the parenting
books:
Sometimes smart people say stupid things. To consider Syria a threat is
to
say a stupid thing. Better?

Not really. Syria has WMD's and financially supports Hezbollah. You
don't
think that makes them a threat?

Nope. Not to this country. Maybe to American tourists travelling in Israel,
but not to this country. Perhaps it depends on your definition of "threat".
If you define it as a force which can whack us on the knee every so often,
then there are threats. Always have been, always will be. Remember when
someone released nerve gas in the Japanese subway some years back? That
could happen here, but we won't attack Japan.

If you're referring to a force on the same scale as the 5 most formidable
armies of WWII (Germany, Japan, Russia, England and ours), our only current
concern might be Russia, assuming we loaned them enough money to stock up on
ammo. China has the army, but no need to use it. They're taking over the
world in the same way we did around 1900 - with trade.