On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:10:29 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:46:06 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:03:50 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:58:39 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:23:32 GMT, Don White
wrote:

John H wrote:



Better let Harry do the talking, and you do the follow up. Works
better that
way.


Ok...let's substitute 'high powered yellow Mustang' for SUV....
make more sense?

I'm getting over 21mpg in the Mustang. Not bad. It's not really high
powered
though, only a 4.6L.

I thought your Mustang was a GT?

It is. The GT has a 4.6L V-8, with an advertised 300hp. I don't do a lot
of drag
racing though. (Although, I *know* it'll do 110mph in 3rd gear - without
redlining.) I've only done that once. That was enough.

Fuel Injected? I didn't know you could push the Ford standard 4.6 L
to 300 hp without altering something major. Supposedly this is Ford's
standard engine package across the product line.

Interesting.


http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2...05/244450.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/05fordmustang.html

And you can push it to 500 hp

http://www.tuningnews.net/news/04110...g-projects.php


Thanks for the URL's, Jim. All that good news fluff makes me feel better about
spending the bucks on my toy!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."