"Peter Aitken" wrote in message
. ..
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

"Peter Aitken" wrote in message
.. .
"Kubez" wrote in message
...
HarryKrause wrote in
:

No, what we would have is a payoff to Bush's wall street contributors.

Today, if you die the day after you retire, your family gets an
insignificant death benefit.

With the Bush plan, your family gets EVERY PENNY YOU CONTRIBUTED to
your
private plan.

That's the way SS is SUPPOSED to work.

Actually that is the way it was supposed to work in the past. Bush is
offering an alternative that offers real value.

It is not life insurance, it is retirement for the worker. When a retiree
dies just after retiring it balances out the retiree who collects
benefits til he is 100 years old. That's exactly how it is supposed to
work.

So who says it has to work that way now?


The "who says" argument is at the 4th grade level and using it is a pretty
sure indicator of feeble intelligence and poor education. If you have any
intelligent counters to my argument let's hear them. If you don't maybe
you ought to keep your opinions to yourself.

--
Peter Aitken



Now that was quite a juvenile and easy way to dismiss a compelling argument
Peter. Obviously you had no choice but to offer a rebuttal with insults and
name calling.

And you have the gall to accuse others of 4th grade level debating. LOL.

Checkmate my friend.