"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...


NOYB wrote:



In the end, some form of Social Security reform will also be
implemented. Perhaps it will be an older age to collect benefits.
Perhaps it will be lower benefits for the affluent. Perhaps it will
be partial privatization for people under age 35. In any case, Bush's
strategy will have been responsible for the change.

Wonderful rationalization for upcoming backpedaling, but b.s


You obviously don't know much about negotiations...particularly
negotiations in which you hold all the cards.

The sort of political arrogance your side exhibits is what is leading to
its downfall


Downfall? Republicans have won the last two Presidential elections, have
added seats in the House and Senate in 2000, 2002, and 2004, and have
increased the number of Governors in each of those same years.

You better look up the definition of "downfall".




You have nowhere to go but...down.

Sure we do. Can you say "filibuster-busting supermajority"?