"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:05:09 -0400, "P. Fritz"
wrote:
"John Jay" wrote in message
...
Kevin,
I know you know people could be prosecuted for terrorist acts way
before
their was a Homeland Security Act. What makes you think this crime
and
the
prosecution of this crime has anything to do with the Homeland
Security
Act?
You must make liberals cringe whenever you open you mouth. You are
an
embarrassment to liberals all over the world.
Once again 'kevin' proves to the world he is the "King of the NG
idiots"
This took about a minute to find................. I think (b.2)
pretty
much describes the situation.
If kevin were a real man he would disappear for a week for being so
stupid, more likely he will argue that a automobile is not a
conveyance.
LMAO
Here is the text of the Georgia code, Section 16-11-37.
(a) A person commits the offense of a terroristic threat when he
threatens
to commit any crime of violence or to burn or damage property with the
purpose of terrorizing another or of causing the evacuation of a
building,
place of assembly, or facility of public transportation or otherwise
causing serious public inconvenience, or in reckless disregard of the
risk
of causing such terror or inconvenience.
No person shall be convicted under this subsection on the
uncorroborated
testimony of the party to whom the threat is communicated.
(b) A person commits the offense of a terroristic act when:
(1) He uses a burning or flaming cross or other burning or flaming
symbol
or flambeau with the intent to terrorize another or another's household;
or
(2) While not in the commission of a lawful act, he shoots at or
throws an
object at a conveyance which is being operated or which is occupied by
passengers.
(c) A person convicted of the offense of a terroristic threat or act
shall
be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000.00 or by imprisonment for
not
less than one nor more than five years, or both.
(d) A person who commits or attempts to commit a terroristic threat or
act
with the intent to retaliate against any person for:
(1) Attending a judicial or administrative proceeding as a witness or
party or producing any record, document, or other object in a judicial
or
official proceeding; or
(2) Providing to a law enforcement officer, adult or juvenile
probation
officer, prosecuting attorney, or judge any information relating to the
commission or possible commission of an offense under the laws of this
state
or of the United States or a violation of conditions of bail, pretrial
release, probation, or parole shall be guilty of the offense of a
terroristic threat or act and, upon conviction thereof, shall be
punished by
imprisonment for not less than five nor more than ten years or by a fine
of
not less than $50,000.00, or both.
wrote in message
oups.com...
*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
*JimH* wrote:
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(WSB Radio) -- Cherokee County authorities are investigating a
scary
summer trend of teens apparently randomly shooting at passing
vehicles.
WSB's Veronica Waters reports a mailman escaped injury when two
boys,
13 and 14, shot up his truck with an air rifle Monday. But
Cherokee
Sheriff's Spokeswoman Nicole Ebbeskotte says detectives are
still
hoping to get x-rays which might help determine what injured a
14-year-old girl who was hit in the head as she rode in the car
with
her mom on Ball Ground Highway June 8.
"Because of the way it struck the juvenile, we are not able to
get
full
access to the projectile," Ebbeskotte tells WSB. "So we might
not
ever
know if it was truly a bullet or what it actually was."
Police haven't found the weapon the 15-year-old suspect
allegedly
used
in the girl's shooting, though he is reportedly cooperating with
the
investigation. All three teens are charged with terroristic
acts,
and
were released into their parents' custody.
Thursday, 16 June 2005
So what does this have to do with federal authorities and homeland
security
Kevin?
And how about a link to that story?
Who the hell said it had anything to do with local authorities? I
take
it that you don't even understand the what in, and the workings of,
the
Homeland Security act????? Hint: Local authorities can arrest
people
for terroristic acts UNDER the Homeland Security act. It is a not a
"local" law.
How could that be? Kevin said, "It is a not a "local" law."
Kevin will argue 'state' law is not "local"
"the what in" ? Somebody must have been hitting the cash crop early
today.
--
John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
|