"John H" wrote in message
...

Interesting idea, but there are problems with it.

1) There is little or no reason for us not to go after it, whether Syria
likes it or not. First of all, they're an inconsequential force, and
second,
we've already demonstrated that we have little or no regard for the
sovereignty of other countries. Why not just tell the Bashar al-Asad that
we're stopping by for a little visit?

2) It's still a condemnation of the cowboy who waved his dick at Saddam
for
close to a year before actually doing anything. You want a great
conspiracy
theory? Bush *wanted* to give Saddam plenty of time to move the stuff
over
the border.

Think about that last sentence.

Wait a minute -- we went to Iraq, according to the best you guys had
to offer, to steal the Iraq oil. Does Syria have a lot of oil? No?
Then why would we go there?

John, I'm finally going along with the nouveau-Kremlin's thinking! You
should love this. I'm saying that since we no longer believe in borders,
Bush should put his money where his mouth is. If he thinks the WMDs were
shuffled into Syria, he should go after them. That was his main reason for
spanking Iraq. Why not stick to his guns and chase the same weapons into
Syria? Or, is he going to give the Syrians time to shuffle them to Sudan or
Saudi Arabia?


Bush did not want to give Saddam a lot of time. Bush wanted to
convince the UN and all the Dems that it was necessary to change the
regime, like Mr. Clinton wanted to do. He gave Saddam time to get
honest.

Convince the UN? He ridiculed them the entire time he was trying to convince
them. When Powell allowed that the UN might have a purpose, he was silenced
and never said it again, until recently when we needed their help in
cleaning up our mess.