"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

David Kay has declared that:

Iraq had no stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons.

"Large" stockpiles...



It did not, as claimed by Washington, ship out such weapons to Syria. It
had none to ship.

Blatantly false. Kay said it was not only "possible" that Saddam moved
small amounts of WMD, technology, and documentation to Syria, but it was
"probable".


Iraq had no weapons programs to speak of after about 1995.

That is false as well. Kay said Iraq got rid of the large stockpiles, but
continued work on long range delivery systems (a UN violation)...and kept
"the scientists and the technology" and other activities that point to an
intent to resume chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.


Iraq did not get any nuclear cake from Niger.

Nobody ever claimed they did. Saddam did *pursue* it, however...despite
what the nincompoop husband of that CIA employee says.


Kay's job was to find *weapons*. He didn't find 'em in Iraq. It's the next
guy's job to find where they went. Afterall, Clinton was so convinced they
existed in 1998, that he signed the Iraqi Regime Change Act. Was he lying
too?