"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Jeff Rigby" wrote in message
...


The Russians just about admitted when they complained about some of
their nationals being killed by our planes that they were removing
"incriminating technology" from Irag into Syria. Speculation was they
they were moving records, advanced SAM systems, GPS jamming systems,
Computers, missles and other equipment that they weren't allowed to
sell Saddam. Trucks were seen loading at sites north of Bagdad and
driving east. Since they had information on our satellite systems they
could time the travel so that we couldn't see where they went.


Frankly, who could blame them for having equipment there? There's only
so far you can go with testing certain technologies before you finally
have to try them in real world situations. We are no different. Remember
some of the news reports in the first days of Desert Storm? All the
networks were reporting comments from the military, and even companies
like Raytheon, about new technologies we were pleased with (or those
which needed work).

Well no kidding. But the UN didn't have sanctions on Iraq in the 80's.
In the 90's, the sanctions were in place, and Russia was a signatory to
them.


So? We violate treaties when it's convenient.

So what. You specifically mentioned the US weapons found in Iraq during the
first Gulf War. I simply reminded you that those weapons were sold to Iraq
during the Iraq/Iran conflict when no trade embargo existed.