Gene Kearns wrote:
On 25 Jan 2004 08:26:40 -0800, (Backyard
Renegade) wrote:
When I worked for GM, I specialized in Port Fuel Injection runability
problems. Personally, I find K's posts, which btw are on topic,
facinating. Everything she talks about brings back fond memories of
studying chamber readings on the occilliscope, and comparing them with
emissions readings... If you know what you are looking at, you can see
that K is pretty much on the mark here with *MOST* of her theory. So
go back to shilling the union threads Harry, hopefully most will
ignore you there too...
Scotty from SmallBoats.com
I've probably missed most of this foolishness, having killed K's
posts... I only see the flotsam, but it seems not much has changed.
For example:
(c) Old worn engines & new 2 stroke OBs allow lube oil into
the combustion chamber, this has the effect of reducing the fuels octane
rating.....
One wonders what the "old 2 stroke OBs" did. I foolishly mixed oil in
my fuel, thus causing it to enter the combustion chamber.... my bad.
(d) The very small amounts of oil stay in the crankcase &
get hotter & hotter & hotter,
?? If the small amounts of oil "stay there" then they accumulate and
there are no longer "small amounts." One wonders why the crankcase
doesn't melt, since there is nothing to cool it. You know, somebody
should think of a way to liquid cool the hot sections of these things.
Out of curiosity, are there any differences between DFI for the GM
engines and the DFI used by FICHT? At what point does one consider
timing to be too far retarded for idle conditions... and why? What
are the deleterious effects to the engine?
How many incorrect premises does it take to make a conclusion
incorrect?
PS
This has nothing to do with Harry, as far as I'm concerned. This is
about a poster that has boasted that she can post what she wants, when
she wants.... "you're not the boss of me".... knowing that her 850+
line, mostly OT, diatribes inconvenience and likely cost other posters
money, since they are forced to download the chaff with the wheat.
This is about a poster that says screw you, I'm going to post the same
850 lines of crap along with half truths and irrational conclusions...
hate mail about a particular engine configuration. I don't get it,
maybe you do.
This is no more on topic than screaming, "FIRE," without just cause,
during the movie Inferno. It is trolling, pure and simple.
My real issue with Ms. Smith is that she is no more accurate in her
posts than Skipper was, her manners are worse than his, and her language
skills are an abomination. At least Skipper was funny on occasion. I
don't know what caused his meltdown at the end here...perhaps that
terminal disease creeping up on him.
So many of Smith's "technical" posts have had errors in them, I simply
gave up reading them for content years ago. The last one of hers I
remember, this past week, indicated she had no understanding of the
Coriolis effect.
While I am an experienced boater, I do not position myself as a
technical expert on boating. I have been boating for more than 50 years
on the ocean and other waters, mostly in small boats, without serious
mishap. Our Ms. Smith pretends to be an expert, and then flips out when
her errors are pointed out. This is pretty funny, actually, because most
of her posts here do not contain original material, but simply her
mis-translation of explanations posted elsewhere. Her language skills
are so bad, she cannot transpose or rewrite without screwing the pooch.
--
Email sent to
is never read.