On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:38:35 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Saying "we found no evidence" is a lot different from "there were no
weapons moved". Duelfer emphatically clarified this point when he issued
his assessment.

Did you overlook this?
"The Iraq Survey Group's main findings -- that Hussein's Iraq did not
possess chemical and biological weapons and had only aspirations for a
nuclear program".

If he didn't *possess* WMD, how could he have moved them?


The report *did* mention that the transfer may have taken place, but that
the ISG could not confirm nor absolutely deny that it ever took place.

What? The ISG couldn't prove a negative? I can't absolutely deny that
you are from a different planet, but then . . . ;-)