"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
That's funny, they reduced the deficit under Clinton *and* had NO
terrorist attacks on US soil...


Nice editing there, NOBBY. Almost makes it look like you're about to make
a point...

NOYB wrote:
...except for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing,

The perpetrators of which are all behind bars for life, after due process.

For what? I thought you said there were no terrorist attacks on our soil
under Clinton?


... the 1995 OKC bombing

The perpetrators of which have either been exectued or in jail for a
really long time, again after due process...

(Nichols had numerous pre-attack contacts with terrorist elements in the
Philippines)

Sure, just like Iraq's imaginary WMD's were shipped to Syria.

They *were* shipped to Syria. The UN weapons inspection group just admitted
the other day that their satellite info showed that the weapons and/or
weapons-making equipment were moved before the war. What the satellites did
not show is where they were moved to.


... and the 1996 downing of TWA 800.

Did that happen in the U.S.?

BTW would you like to mention the U.S. response (along with our former
European allies) to the Lockerbie airplane bombing, which is one of the
big reasons why Libya is backing off from sponsoring terrorism? Dubya had
a *lot* to do with that, din't he, huh?



Nawww. No domestic terrorist attacks there, right?


None that were not taken care of, including due process of law...
something that the Bushies seem uneasy with...

Arresting the mercenaries has very little affect. It's the equivalent of
arresting the "soldiers" when the FBI goes after the mob. It did very
little good until they nabbed the bosses.