|
|
|
|
On 6 Jun 2005 08:09:10 -0700, wrote:
It *assumes* a
religious intolerance that may or may not exist. In my case, it doesn't
*********
Which is why it is "likely", not "certain".
And as far as "religious intolerance may not exist!".....that's a very
interesting approach.
Does it salve the conscience when applied to other social issues as
well? That puts religious intolerance into the same junk-science
category as global warming, doesn't it?
My point remains; Harry is once again getting out of control with these
political trollings.
Everybody already *knows* what the ten guys who will get outraged, call
him names, take the
discussion to a personal level, etc, are going to do and say- including
Harry. Very boring.
And my point (in no way defending Harry) was that your post was the same thing
as Harry's, a troll. In my case, the religious intolerance you want to "very
likely" dump on conservatives, does not exist.
As for other social issues, ask and I'll tell. I personally don't see the
relationship between religious intolerance and global warming.
--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD
"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)
|