On Sun, 22 May 2005 19:02:54 -0400, John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:58:30 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:31:18 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



John H wrote:


On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:




John H wrote:



On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:





John H wrote:





Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the mindless
righties here?


You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you make 'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the folks you
continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet, the headers of the threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric contained therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the same folks names in
'response' to another's post.


I don't mean I read the headers for content, John. I don't see the
content. All I see is FROM and SUBJECT.

I can tell by the FROM that most of the garbage these days emanates from
the right-wingers? Why? Because before I filtered them out, they made
their positions apparent.

Nearly all the "anti-Krause rhetoric," as you call it, comes from the
right-wingers, and it is a result of their not approving of my politics
and my distaste for their idiot leader, Bushcrap.

Ergo, if it is anti-Krause rhetoric, it is almost for sure coming from
the right-wing here.


The subject is the title of the thread, Harry. Once someone changes the subject,
they've started a new thread. My point is that the 'subject' does not provide a
'direction' of the posts within the thread that are from the anti-Krauseites.

Harry, do you *really* believe the names you are called are reflective of your
simply being a Democrat?



John.

I don't care if it is a "new thread." If it is from the "usual
suspects," and they are ID'd in the FROM info, then it is right-wing
trashtalk. Especially these days.

No, it isn't simply because I am a Democrat. It is because I trash their
fearful leader and their selfish, self-centered nonprinciples from time
to time. And I'm good it it.

Are you, then, saying that regardless of the thread title, *any* post from the
several anti-Krauseites you site are automatically anti-Krause because of your
politics?

I am not about to question your ability to write trash.

edit: site should be cite (I think!)

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)