"*JimH*" wrote in message ...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:



John H wrote:



Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that
it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that
there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few
folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think
one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the mindless
righties here?

You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you make
'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the folks you
continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet, the headers of the
threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric contained
therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the same folks
names in
'response' to another's post.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

John I want to slap you silly. A month ago you hated this guy and exposed
all his lies and insults. Now you are playing footsie with him.

He has a history with the NG, documented by over 21,000 posts OT of insults
and put downs, all of which were directed to those having an opposing
opinion to his. Countless members have attested to the same.

He has stalked me and my wife. He has posted our address and claimed to
have obtained pictures of our house. Later he threatened us.

He did the same to MadCow.

He has insulted you. He has insulted most every member of this NG.

So why the change in heart with this loser John? You are not going to
change him.

Once pond scum....always pond scum.

If your intention is to improve the tone in this NG you would be better
served to focus your attention elsewhere.

Don't be fooled by his sudden change of heart with you.

Wake up dude.



Sad how weenie JimH uses the newsgroup for a life because he has
no life.

CN