JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
John H wrote:
On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote:
John H wrote:
On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and
pasted
some
off topic
trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup,
but
*was* intended
to create more political conflict.
For shame!
--
John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of
the
newsgroup"
BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John?
That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh?
Bad hair day?
--
John H
John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've
stated
over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for group
harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems
it's
okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I
wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be
"invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if
someone
were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they
wanted to answer that question?
Do you really have to post here day after day with this attitude of
yours?
It is really getting old Kevin. Try a positive attitude for a
change....you
will like it.
Why is it MY attitude? JohnH is the one that chastised me for not
"being invited" to a thread!! THAT is a negative attitude. I was simply
trying to figure out just how the "inviting" thing is going to
work.....