Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:40:15 +1100, K Smith
wrote:



I sincerely hope you read & challenge any of the facts,


Unlikely that I'll waste the bandwidth. My issue is with the selection
of facts the conclusion(s) are drawn from.

No "conclusions" have been drawn; yet. & so far the facts seem OK?? So
why are you so upset when I start an on topic thread?? What you think
Ficht is OK?? surely not?? it sent OMC under, $1.3 billion of retirees'
money lost, & about 7000 jobs. I know Bill pretends it's all OK now but
he sells sells sells. Gees louise he even denied there were any problems
till OMC itself admitted 2 in 5.


but just saying
you don't like me is of no consequence to me,


Nice. An implicit lie. Please point to that sentence.

So you do like me, that's a relief:-) I like you too.


saying I don't like Harry
as if that's a problem I'll wear that like a crown, thanks:-)


I really don't care if you and Harry don't like each other or not. It
isn't any of my business or the business of other posters here on
rec.boats... and that is the point I have tried to make before. In
fact, a lot of the stuff you have posted recently (especially those
850+ line diatribes) should have been personal correspondence between
you and Harry... not aired in an open forum. I really don't need you
to show me your dirty linen, nor do I need to see Harry's.... and I
think I speak for nearly all of the posters, here. Take it off the
forum and if you must, email Harry directly.

No thanks that lying grub has chased me for years & now I return the
favour, if you don't like it please just kill file me, or just don't
bother with the appended material. Do whatever makes you feel better.

Here is a point to ponder... why force everybody that comes to this
newsgroup to download scores of 850+ line posts because you have a
problem with another poster? You are punishing the wrong person(s).
Try email.....

I don't "force" anyone to read anything, gee I wish you policed the OT
threads the way you seek to control what I post. You have no control
over my posts as nobody can stop the lying socialist idiot starting his
OT political threads, so either challenge the substance of what I say or
don't bother.


Have you
noticed that apart from his mad dog posts, the NG is much better without
him?? nowhere near as much OT political crap?? anyway just my perception
I guess.

K


I am afraid these are just your perceptions, or for illustration,
your facts. Yes, the fact is that it would be better not to see Harry
post off topic. Your conclusion is tainted by the inclusion of just
one fact. A better conclusion would be to cite the fact that it would
be better not to see any off topic posts. Conclusions drawn from that
body of facts would be more accurate and useful.

I agree but as I said the OT posts have gone way down since the liar
was bussed out to protest or whatever. If you don't agree then fine, but
honestly look at the threads they're mostly on topic & there's much less
nastiness. I submit because the lying little grub is not here.

Your fact about Harry is no better than your fact about FICHT... you
despise both of them and you need to let it go and move past that to
posting useful information that appeals to other people. Your hatred
for Harry and FICHT has a very limited audience and your preoccupation
with both makes your posts seem very strange.

I don't despise ficht I despise that the OMC dealers came here &
spam/lied about it. With people like you running interference for them
no wonder people get taken in by dealer BS. I'll continue to say what I
say & I guess you'll continue to bang your head against the wall in
protest, however the best protest you could make is to correct my facts.
At the end when I do draw it together I'll make it clear "conclusions"
are just my opinion & that you or anyone should draw their own, in the
mean time we better make sure of the issues.

You are able to keep up aren't you Gene?? Let me know & I'll explain
anything till even Bill can understand it.

K