|
|
|
|
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
John H wrote in message . ..
On 15 Jan 2004 04:33:43 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . ..
On 14 Jan 2004 05:05:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . ..
On 13 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
Did you not make the following statement?
************************************************** ********
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
************************************************** *******
+++++++.+ Again, the Army War College said nothing. Read the
article. The war
college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed
agreement with it.
No, I didn't make the above statement. That is a title. I just don't
understand the right. It wouldn't matter if someone caught Bush
killing a cat with his bare hands, on tape, with sound, and perfect
video. You all would still say the person who took the video was a
left wing, unpatriotic liar!!!
In my computer, when I post a new message, I type the title. In doing
so I am making a statement. You, for example, could have titled your
post:
*Jeffrey Record says Iraq "unnecessary"*
But that wouldn't be much of an attention grabber, would it? Therefore
you chose to make the statement you did, which was a lie.
In your example, I would entitle the piece something like:
*Bush kills rabid cat with bare hands, thus protecting hundreds of
spectators who were soon to be bitten*
See how easy it is to be honest?
John H
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!
It is a TITLE, John. Nothing more. Nothing less. Now, if in the body
of the piece, I said that I *knew for a fact* that the War College
says Iraq war unneccessary, that would be different. But, again, your
too far right, with too tight of blinders to see anything but your
BushCo agenda. Again, I can't believe how you rights can't see
anything but that.
So, if I wrote a title which said,
Basskisser is full of "****"
and then went on in the body of the piece to say something different,
there would be no problem?
Nope, if there was no implication of truth in the body, there
wouldn't. In this case, there is.
You made a statement of fact in your title. That was a false
statement.
Again, my comments regarding your statement do not reflect my
leanings. If name-calling ("too tight of blinders") helps your
self-esteem, go for it.
I think everybody here knows which way YOU lean!
|