"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 May 2005 13:37:03 -0400, "Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers"
Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote:

The entire North Atlantic is being so severely overfished that it may
completely collapse by 2010, reveals the first comprehensive survey of the
entire ocean's fishery.

"We'll all be eating jellyfish sandwiches," says Reg Watson, a fisheries
scientist at the University of British Columbia. Putting new ocean-wide
management plans into place is the only way to reverse the trend, Watson
and
his colleagues say.

North Atlantic catches have fallen by half since 1950, despite a tripling
of
the effort put into catching them. The total number of fish in the ocean
has
fallen even further, they say, with just one sixth as many high-quality
"table fish" like cod and tuna as there were in 1900. Fish prices have
risen
six fold in real terms in 50 years.

The shortage of table fish has forced a switch to other species. "The
jellyfish sandwich is not a metaphor - jellyfish is being exported from
the
US," says Daniel Pauly, also at the University of British Columbia. "In
the
Gulf of Maine people were catching cod a few decades ago. Now they're
catching sea cucumber. By earlier standards, these things are repulsive,"
he
says.

Off limits
The only hope for the fishery is to drastically limit fishing, for
instance
by declaring large portions of the ocean off-limits and at the same time
reducing the number of fishing ships. Piecemeal efforts to protect certain
fisheries have only caused the fishing fleet to overfish somewhere else,
such as west Africa.

"It's like shuffling the deckchairs on the Titanic," says Andrew
Rosenberg,
at the University of New Hampshire. He says the number of boats must be
reduced: "Less is actually more with fisheries. If you fish less you get
more fish."

Normally, falling catches would drive some fishers out of business. But
government subsidies actually encourage overfishing, Watson says, with
subsidies totalling about $2.5 billion a year in the North Atlantic.

However, Rosenberg was sceptical that any international fishing agreements
currently on the table will turn the tide in a short enough timescale. The
UN's Food and Agriculture Organization and the OECD have initiatives but
these are voluntary, he says. A UN-backed monitoring and enforcement plan
of
action is being discussed but could take 10 years to come into force.

Pauly says only a public reaction like that against whaling in the 1970s
would be enough to bring about sufficient change in the way the fish
stocks
are managed.

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn1940



Over fishing for menhaden is affecting the water quality and other species
of
fish in the bay. The government will probably put more restrictions on
sport
fishermen and say they've done a good job.

Last year, Florida introduced new regulations to curb the overfishing of
grouper. Commercial guys hit their quota around September, and no more Gulf
grouper could be caught commercially for the rest of the year. The
recreation guys were told that we could keep no more than 5 grouper
total...and only 2 of them could be red grouper (5/2)

This year, the commercial guys seem to have successfully lobbied to get the
recreational limit curbed even further. We may be facing a limit decrease
from 5/2 to 3/1. We also may be facing a *CLOSED* season from October
through December.

What strikes me as incredibly unfair is the fact that recreational anglers
are being assigned equal blame for the decline. We're the majority, yet we
account for only about 10% of the grouper taken from the Gulf.

Overfishing is a problem created by commercial fisherman, and not the fault
of the recreational angler.