"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:54:38 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .


Also, if the leader of said country invades another country for the
sole purpose of taking it over and subjugating the population for his
own benefit, then that also qualifies.

Hey...we did this recently.

When?

That place in the desert....you know....Iraq?


If the country also takes an
aggressive policy of amassing a large arsenal of weapons with the
intent to use them (domestically or otherwise), then I'd say that
qualifies as well.

We've been doing this since 1946. We supposedly stopped creating chem/bio
weapons, but the nuclear arsenal continues to grow.

Really? Where did you hear that we are still building nukes? According
to the various START and SALT treaties, we should v'e been reducing
that stockpile.

Dave, this is disturbing. You continue to lie to me. You say you get your
information from a variety of news sources, but you are ignorant of so much
going on around you.

Be sure not to fixate on one source which you may deem to be partisan,
without first reading all of them, and perhaps doing your OWN search. And,
if you still believe we're behaving, let me know. Just for you, I'll contact
my senator's office and get some official stuff for you. Just be sure that
you really want to know these things. When you're cornered, your only
possible response may be "Oh yeah? Well, Gore lost the election."

http://www.charleston.net/stories/04...r_23bomb.shtml

http://www.wired.com/news/technology...,47319,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story...541845,00.html

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0802/080702gsn1.htm

http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-56/iss-11/p32.html

http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2002_...ster_dec02.asp

Have a nice day, Dave.