"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
Mo

"The investigation centered on the possibility that

WMD materials were moved to Syria. As is obvious

from other sections of the Comprehensive Report,

Syria was involved in transactions and shipments of

military and other material to Iraq in contravention

of the UN sanctions. This indicated a fl exibility with

respect to international law and a strong willingness

to work with Iraq-at least when there was considerable

profi t for those involved. Whether Syria received

military items from Iraq for safekeeping or other

reasons has yet to be determined."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then why is mainstream media overstating the conclusions of the report and
stating it as "conclusive evidence"?


And some mo
"There was evidence

of a discussion of possible WMD collaboration initiated

by a Syrian security officer, and ISG received

information about movement of material out of Iraq,

including the possibility that WMD was involved. In

the judgment of the working group, these reports were

sufficiently credible to merit further investigation.

ISG was unable to complete its investigation and

is unable to rule out the possibility that WMD was

evacuated to Syria before the war."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"unable to complete its investigation"?!?!?!?

"possibility that WMD was evacuated to Syria before the war"?!?!?



That's hardly "conclusive evidence" that WMD didn't exist!!!