Jimcomma,
That was not an insult, it was an observation. Besides what kind of
argument can one give that you are 3 steps (ok maybe 20) behind everyone
else? You are the only one who didn't realize George Orwell and Mr Melon
are the same person.

By the way, this person has many other handles, if it comes through an
anonymous remailer, uses the same writing style, talks about the exact same
subject, uses the exact same insults, it probably is the same person.

Are you having someone else read and summarize your cut and paste before
posting them?


"Jim," wrote in message
...
Yes, it's me wrote:
Jimcomma,
You appear to have the IQ of a vegetable. Of course the two are the
same, everyone knows that. Damn are you sure you are not Bassy.

Yep the phony address cowards have to resort to insults when they have no
argument


"Jim," wrote in message
...

George Orwell wrote: As did Mr Melon -- both through remailers Hummmmmmmm

On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, "Bert Robbins" wrote:


"Jim," wrote in message
...


Well, As one observation, I just happened to hear that particular
sermon mentioned. Had I been on an aisle seat, I would have been out
of there. I was not aware at the time that the topic for the "sermon"
(or paid political announcement) came from Rome. As it is I am
somewhat ashamed that I didn't stand and challenge the priest for
mixing religion and politics. Needless to say; I haven't been back.

When a priest preaches that support for one political candidate is
sinful, it sure as hell *IS* an attempt to influence politics. And
Some Catholics are conditioned so that the clergy can do no wrong, I
find the Salon article entirely believable, based on my personal
experience.

The Catholic Church was the Catholic Church long before you began your
pitiful life. If you don't agree with the teachings of the Catholic
Church you can go and join another church that is to your liking.

If you believe that religions shouldn't be involved in politics then
you should be outraged anytime a candidate for political office or some
one that is holding a political office appears at a religious
institution and steps up to the pulpit and speaks. Until then keep your
moral outrage to yourself you hypocrite.

The problem with moral relativism is that its beliefs go with the wind.
The beliefs never stay the same for any lengthy period of time so you
can never be sure what you are believing in. You can get caught on the
wrong side of the issue because you didn't get the word that the
beliefs have just changed.



So what compells you to rise to the stench of an off toic post? Hell,
even
a carp with an IQ of 0.00001 wouldn't take the bait.

Are you a spammer and get your rocks off on it or do you just have an IQ
lower than a carp?

This is rec.boats, not wrecked.boats.