BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 4/12/05 7:28 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:

I've stated unequivocally that there are students with disabilities who
benefit from the same curriculum as non-disabled peers.

But you consistently argue a debate about general "mainstreaming" policy
within the narrow framework of one particular student who may not benefit.

I'm talking about an millions of students...all those who deserve a more
appropriate curriculum than one that is designed for a different purpose and
need.

No, you're trying to use a single example as a model for millions of others.
You have absolutely no idea what an "appropriate curriculum" is for *any*
disabled student, not even your example. How could you? You don't know any
of them and you don't know WHAT they need.

Since most people with intellectual disabilities have numeracy and literacy
skills at an elementary school level, none of them need Grade 12 chemistry.
This is not really so complicated. The "mainstream" curriculum is about
following prescribed units of study and getting grades for post-secondary
education at college or university. There is an entirely different reality
for people with intellectual disabilities and forcing them to waste their
time on someone else's curriculum is waste and neglect.

I'm simply not allowing you to set policy based on one extreme
example. I'm arguing for nuance and erring on the side of inclusiveness,
while you seem to be arguing on the side of exclusion.

It's not one extreme example. I am talking about all the millions of kids
that deserve a curriculum designed for their needs, not one that is tailored
to the needs of others.

Problem with your theory is that in many cases, the curriculum tailored for
the "needs of others" is perfectly appropriate for the disabled.

Not for people with intellectual disabilities or any other type of
disability that calls for a different curriculum.

That they
may need *other* programs targeted at specific, individual needs of a
specific disable student is irrelevant to the greater need that *all*
children have for a basic education and socialization.

1) They are not receiving a basic education, they are wasting precious time
on someone else's curriculum that does not meet their needs

2) They are being socialized into uselessness by sitting in a classroom that
is designed to meet someone else's needs and being humiliated in the process