Dear Group of Idiots and Peggie Hall Labia Lappers,

All too often, some people attempt to make an argument by attacking and
insulting those who hold opposing views. Bruce's tactics are a perfect
example. So let's begin, quite properly, with a brief look at the
historical development of the problem, of its attempted solutions, and of
the eternal argument about it. Try as I may, I can't understand why he
would want to gag free speech. I and Bruce part company when it comes to
the issue of sucking Peggie's dick. He feels that newsgroups should belong
to imbeciles, while I insist that she has garnered enough support to
accelerate the natural tendency of Usenet to devolve from lame to lamer,
liberty to tyranny, virtue to vice and freedom of speech to censorship but
not enough support to make her **** not stink. Or, to express that
sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, he uses the words
without ever having taken the time to look them up in the dictionary.
People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored,
not debated, debased, debauched and debunked as is the temptation.

It's a well-known fact that the worst sorts of dissolute yokels there are
thrive on hatred rather than love. It's an equally well-known fact that I
don't need to be particularly delicate here. When logic puts these two
facts together, the necessary result is an understanding that Bruce takes
things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide
decent referencing so the reader can check up on him. He also ignores all
of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly
contradicts) his position.
Out of the vast number of devastating evils for which self-righteous
yahoos are directly or indirectly responsible, I shall pick out only a
single one which is most in keeping with the inner essence of Bruce's
antisocial agendas: defeatism. The idea of letting him fill the air with
recrimination and rancor is, in itself, treacherous. That being the case,
we can infer that the baneful nature of his witticisms is not just a
rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. I think I've dished it out to
Bruce as best as I can in this letter. I hope you now understand why I say
that Bruce is positing a "valid" logic devoid of empirical content (i.e.,
devoid of facts).

Respectfully,
Capt. Neal

I am soooo sorry Neal....I am an Idiot and so unworthy of reading your
response. Are you still looking for someone as intelligent as yourself to
exchange ideas with? Write long rambling disjointed post that try to make a
point but fail because the thesaurus is stuck on the keyboard? I am sorry
you won't find it here, as we are all idiots and Peggie Hall Labia Lappers.
You might try the mensa.sigs.giftedchildern group to satisfy you needs.
Capt Neal, please refer to me as a 'dissolute yokel"...I like that better
than my given name. Have a nice day.