Red CloudŽ wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:51:56 +0000 (UTC), "Soque (Enjoque) Pupette"
wrote:
Thom Stewart wrote:
JR,
Are you posting to me or the STUPID FORGER that lives in Pacific Time
Zone+3 ( EASTERN TIME ZONE) that posted the Forgery.
FORGERY: What Flonkers consider FREE SPEECH!!???
No.
For it to be a forgery, it would have to be your real address.
is not your address, but you might not catch it
unless you look closely.
Do you see the difference between "webtv.net" and "web|v.net" ?
Incorrect.
Bzzzt. It is you that is incorrect.
Forgeries are rarely exact duplicates, which is why we know that
forgeries exist. They are often imperfect. You can be convicted of forgery of
U.S. currency, even if your work is extremely crude, and clearly not real
currency even under the most careless scrutiny. All that is required under the
law is that YOU present it as being real currency, and try to pass it off as
real. When you get to court, you cannot claim that it wasn't forgery because on
the bill, Jackson's eye was closed, see how far you get.
Just because you are a lousy forger, doesn't mean you are not a forger.
Why are you talking about currency? Do you think a Usenet post is
a financial instrument?
Try to follow along; we're talking about what constitutes forgery in
a Usenet post.
--
,,,
..oo
c
- Soque
|