Thread: Pathetic Neal
View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Wally
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lady Pilot wrote:

Ignoratio Elenchi.


Name calling doesn't suit you, Wally.


It's not name-calling (sheesh!tm). It means, roughly, that youre
*ignoring* the issue - it has nothing to do with whether or not you are
*ignorant*. I didn't say, or imply, that you had netcopped anyone - you
didn't answer my point, you responded to some point I didn't make;
consequently, your response above was irrelevant. Which was why I went on to
ask...

What are you talking about?




Actually, I'm glad she announced it. Now everyone will know that she
can't be a trusted friend. Gives the group prospective on katy's
true character.


A trusted friend? Are you living in some sort of virtual fantasy land? This
is *usenet* - these people are *strangers*. There is absolutely no reason to
suppose that the online personas we see here are any sort of reliable
indication of what a person is like in real life. It takes a sight more than
a few words on a screen before I call someone a trusted friend. There are
personas here that I like, am indifferent to, and dislike, but that's all
they are - personas.


Tell me, Wally, what did I do for katywails to netcop me? Hmmm?


Something to with you going sailing with Neal? I don't really know - it
wasn't making a sufficently large blip on the radar to be worth looking at
in any depth.


No one is being punished. Use your kill file, that's what it's there
for, Wally.


You haven't asked for my advice, but I will give it for the sake of
the group. Don't respond to anyone regarding this mess. People like
Scotty, Thom, Cairns, and others defending katy and Ganz is only
going to prolong their visit.


Yes, and the same is true about katysails. If she gets spammed, a
trojan or someone takes control of her computer, that's her fault
because she *chose* to netkkkop someone and then brag about it, which
is such a gaynzy way of life.


You and your buddies choose to trash a whole group, the vast majority of the
subscribers of which are innocent, because you didn't like what she did.


So you're saying you want more disruption to the newgroup? whatever

I subscribed to this newsgroup because it *was* a lot of fun.


That's right, LP. It was a lot of fun. The last time this happened, I
seriously considered leaving. Instead, I spent loads of timing killfiling
one disruptor after another. I'm not sure that I can bothered going through
that crap again. From your (not very) veiled threats of continued
disruption, it would seem that you and your pals are intent on making this
place a pointless place to continue subscribing to.

Is that what you want? A wasteland?