On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:44:15 -0500, "P.Fritz"
wrote:


"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

The strongest indication that Terri could have given as to what she
wanted would have been formally assigning DPOA to her husband.

And the strongest evidence that her husband could have given was
announcing her desire immediately, not years later when he was
impregnating someone else.

Bingo! Why didn't he attempt to grant Terri's supposed wishes 14 years
earlier? His timing speaks volumes about the validity of his claim.





The courts should have appointed a 3rd party guardian for her, but from
what I understand, the parents were outlawyerd and once the judgement was
entered, the high courts could only rule on the validity of the lower court
ruling.....not retry the facts of the case.


Guardians were appointed in 1994 and again in 1998 by the court. Although the
second one stated that Michael Schiavo’s decision-making may be influenced by
the potential to inherit the remainder of Terri Schiavo’s estate, he agreed that
Terry Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."