John H wrote:
On 30 Mar 2005 05:50:58 -0800, wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
Possessive "s"
It's NOT "Labatt's". Look at the companies website! Do you contend
that
the owners of the company don't know what they are talking about?
Using your analogy, because Labatt was Labatt's 32 YEARS AGO, then
it
would also be correct to call a Nissan a Datsun?????? Again, just
because people still say "Labatt's" doesn't make it correct. Hell,
it's
so damned simple all you need to do is look on the label. Report
back
to me what it says, okay?
basskisser, do you remember this post of yours?
******************
On 29 Mar 2005 05:26:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:
The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.
**********************
Did you know what you were talking about when you said that?
--
John H
Absolutely! And a clue for you, don't get distance vs. depth of field
confused with depth of field for different focal lengths.