Thread
:
OT for Fritz and Calif Bill - it's LABATT
View Single Post
#
24
John H
Posts: n/a
On 30 Mar 2005 05:50:58 -0800,
wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
Possessive "s"
It's NOT "Labatt's". Look at the companies website! Do you contend that
the owners of the company don't know what they are talking about?
Using your analogy, because Labatt was Labatt's 32 YEARS AGO, then it
would also be correct to call a Nissan a Datsun?????? Again, just
because people still say "Labatt's" doesn't make it correct. Hell, it's
so damned simple all you need to do is look on the label. Report back
to me what it says, okay?
basskisser, do you remember this post of yours?
******************
On 29 Mar 2005 05:26:21 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:
The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.
**********************
Did you know what you were talking about when you said that?
--
John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
Reply With Quote