"Capt. NealŪ" wrote
You're the one who is clueless. You wrote, and I quote, "Your constant
allusions to the act are most likely rooted in your own shameful desire."
The problem lies in the combination of the word 'constant allusions" which
is about a dumb as saying 'jumbo shrimp'. You screwed up the meaning of
your sentence by using constant and allusions together. How can one have a
constant passing reference? Duh. A passing reference, by definition,
cannot be constant.
By rearranging the sentence as I did to show you your illiteracy, I
demonstrated
how to say it correctly.
WRONG! It is certainly possible to make repeated, indirect references, which
is what you have done.
*Constant allusions* then means to make a series of allusions. This is what
you did and I have accurately described your actions.
Scout
|