"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

in NYC, any one of those cops could have defused the situation
with
one
shot, and put the guy down for good with 2-3 shots. Instead, he
was
executed.


You're right. It would seem then that the NYC police department
needs
a
few lessons in marksmanship. A few good shots would have done the
job,
without wasting all that good ammo......

Dave


What an utterly stupid remark. If you'd been their supervisor, would
that
have been your primary source of disappointment with those cops?
They
wasted
so much ammo?


Well, maybe not. Maybe their feet smelled as well......



So, you think it was OK that several cops shot an innocent man over two
dozen times, and found he had no weapon?


Do I think it's ok? Do you think it's proper to ask me, or anyone else's
opinion on this subject, when they were not involved? Maybe if you get
all the facts before you jump to any conclusions, you might find a very
good reason why things unfolded the way they did.

What I think, is irrelevant. I was not there.

I should've known you'd use your usual ploy - the one you reserve for times
when you notice that you've painted yourself into a corner.

Speaking of corners: Go sit in the corner and drink your chocolate milk.