A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 25-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

And yet you cannot refute the author

The existance of my policy is proof enough.

There is no proof your "policy" exists to begin with, there is merely your
assertion that it does. Furthermore, the existence of a "policy," even if
true, does not prove the point under contention, which is whether your
policy provides for hospitalization and surgical care, or whether the author
of the AP article was correct in telling us that Canada forces citizens to
use the state-funded and operated system for hospitalization and surgical
care, which results in rationing of health care and long (and sometimes
fatal) waits.


Of course, you believe anything you read as long as it fits your
narrow, biased view of the world. The rest of us don't believe
everything we read. But then you're a "journalist" so you
have to support other "journalist's" lies.

I certainly have more reason to believe a credible, accredited AP journalist
more than a Netwit such as yourself, who not only can't prove anything, but
can't even formulate a rational argument or rebuttal.

How about you scan and post the policy coverage statement
you have so we can all see if you're lying.

You first - post a credible link to the law that you claim
exists that prevents us from buying the insurance that many
Canadians hold.

I already did. You rejected the source. You didn't disprove the claims made
by that source, however. The truth is easy to find, if you care to look.
Fact is I have looked it up, and the AP reporter was quite correct. No
supplemental insurance policy in Canada will allow you to " jump the queue"
and obtain hospitalization or surgical treatment ahead of others higher on
the priority list.

And you can't prove otherwise.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser