A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

I find it credible

Given your track record for believing in bull****, that means
nothing.

And yet you cannot refute the author.


I've long since lost count of the number of times you are willing
to make a claim that you refuse to back up. Your credibility = 0.

What makes you think I care how you judge my credibility?


Well, you'd like to think so, certainly...the truth, however, may be
somewhat less accommodating to you.

Prove it - I've challenged you on this stuff many times and you still
remain incapable or to scared to even attempt it.

Nah, I've done so many time. You just don't like the answers, so you resort
to ad hominem insults because you've got nothing probative to say.


Nah. It's up to you to refute them.

I've never heard of such a law.

Your ignorance is legendary.

How do I prove something that
doesn't exist?

That you are ignorant does not prove the non-existence of the law.

Your claim - your burden of proof, coward.

Lame.


Moreover, it's entirely likely you're lying.

Prove it.

Why would I bother?


So, does it cover hospitalization and/or surgery in a Canadian hospital?

Yes, dickhead, I've already said that it does.

I don't think so. How about you scan and post the policy coverage statement
you have so we can all see if you're lying.


--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser