View Single Post
  #127   Report Post  
Franklin
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There are many ways that society pays the price for
illness beyond the obvious issues of contagion and health care costs.

The
economic costs of so many Americans sitting at home because they're sick

or
injured is astronomical when you consider things like lost productivity,
overinflated payrolls forced upon employers (which transfer those costs

to
consumers), etc.


And who is responsible for inflated payrolls? The government.


Huh? Payrolls get inflated because businesses don't want to lose their
profit margin, government has nothing to do with it.

When you're a small business owner and your employees are
home sick instead of working, you lose money.


So what? That's just part of the cost of doing business. Why should
government bail out the business owner? Why should I? If the business

owner
fails to properly plan for sick employees, how is that MY problem and why
should I be required to pay for that employee's health care in order to
protect the business owner? If the business owner feels the employee is
essential, then the employer should purchase health insurance to keep him
healthy, not the government or the rest of us.


Again... huh? Who's talking about government bailouts? That's just the
cost of doing business? Sure... to you. You're the one paying for inflated
prices. If the business owner needs to purchase health insurance to keep
his employees healthy, it costs him extra. And you're the one who bears
that additional cost through price increases. Duh.

If his business fails because he plans and manages badly, why, that just
provides an opportunity for some new businessman to try to do it better.

So does the national economy.
It's been a long time since I've seen estimates of the figures, but

they're
enormous.


Not really. You falsely presume that the economic impacts of absenteeism

are
the responsibility of the government to ameliorate or prevent. That
responsibility lies with the employee and the employer and no one else.


No, I don't. I'm simply saying that poor health care has secondary impacts
that, among other things, manifest themselves in higher prices. Higher
prices that *you're* going to pay. You don't want government to step in and
help keep the economy more efficient? Fine, but it'll cost you.