"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Here's a less-than anonymous government official also stating that
Saddam
Hussein was not linked to the 9-11 attack on the US

Bush never said Hussein was not linked to the 9/11 attacks...just that
"We've had no *evidence* that Saddam Hussein was involved with September
the
11th." Of course, that statement was made last September...before
Hussein's
capture.

Under US law, at least until the Bush fascists took over, "no evidence"
meant you were acquitted.

No, not really. It simply meant that despite overwhelming circumstantial
evidence, charges would be held up pending further discovery of hard
evidence.

You see the decision to go to war with Iraq as the trial. I see it as the
serving of an arrest warrant. The trial hasn't even begun and liberals have
already circled the wagons in his defense.