"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:


OK, Rick. Will you agree that they're acts of sedition then?

16 May, 1918
The U.S. Sedition Act

Is this act still in force? Seems to me it was repealed amid a big
political
stink including a McCarthy-esque Red scare.



SECTION 3. Whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully
make
or convey false reports or false statements with intent to interfere
with
the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United
States,

Vice President Cheney is clearly guilty of this part

. . . or incite insubordination,
disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces
of
the United States,

former Senator Jesse Helms is 'way guilty here.

Looks like another case of "the rules only apply to the other side"
wishful
thinking.... are you capable of any other kind, NOBBY?


Let's get back on topic here, Doug...

Do you think it's acceptable for foreign entities to skirt our election laws
via a loophole which allows soliciting campaign advertising contributions
over the internet? It's a scary thought if Americans are limited as to how
much they can donate towards a candidate's campaign...but non-American
people, companies, and governments can spend an unlimited amount that will
go towards advertising for a specific candidate.