wrote in message
oups.com...
Dr. John John Smith wrote:

Since I am a proponent of
mandatory education, I wondered why the political comment was not
removed by
the person cut and pasting the post.


A non political post would have been more effective in selling the
concept.

**********************

Aren't you among the crowd normally critical of editing cut 'n paste
before posting?

Why do you insist on seeing the remark as a "slam" against Republicans?
Why so defensive?

Dave Kutz wrote a sentence that made two statements.

1) The opposition to the bill seemed to come from some Republicans
2) The opposing Republicans were not well informed about the provisions
of the bill.

How is that a "political" statement?


You conveniently left out the word *uninformed* in statement #1 and #2 and
there was no comment about the democrats voting against the bill being
*uninformed*.

Don't try to spin this Chuck. Your intention was quite evident.

I would have simply stated that the State Senate voted in a bill requiring
stricter boater education and posted a link showing the specifics of the
bill.

You didn't. You made it about partisan politics.