On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:15:07 -0500, DSK wrote:

NOYB wrote:

Study Shows U.S. Election Coverage Harder on Bush


Mar 14, 10:01 AM (ET)


By Claudia Parsons

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. media coverage of last year's election was three
times more likely to be negative toward President Bush than Democratic
challenger John Kerry, according to a study released Monday.

I find that rather hard to believe, when Bush's smear campaigns against
Kerry were reported as straight news and Kerry's explanations reported
as "campaign publicity." How much footage of Bush's dismal performances
in the debates was carried on news channels?

Here is a case of the right wing screaming about "liberal bias" because
the public media is not 100% neo-con controlled.

DSK

How much play did Bush's National Guard record get in the "straight news" versus
the river boat "heroics" of John Kerry as presented by the Swift Boat Veterans?

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."