There is no aggression, and there is no compliance...but there is 
assertiveness.... 
 
"Capt. Mooron"  wrote in message 
news:WrfZd.56939$fc4.56085@edtnps89... 
 I'm not certain if you are being compliant or assertive with that 
 statement! 
 
 It must be assertive since I sense a bit of aggression....  :-) 
 
 CM 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 You can disagree all you want to...you are wrong.  Enjoy your wrongness. 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in message 
 news:Yj8Zd.56440$fc4.24526@edtnps89... 
I disagree..... assertiveness is most certainly a response to outside 
stimuli. Initial actions cannot be undertaken without the premise of 
interaction between at least 2 people.... at this point you have the 
initiation and the response. 
 
 If you are subject to an assertive request... you must decide upon it's 
 validity, pertinence and reach a decision that you will either comply or 
 refuse. If you decide to comply.... the point of assertive behaviour is 
 moot. You have in effect agreed to be compliant. If you decide to 
 refuse... you have taken a stance that will require to be defended. To 
 effect this will necessitate an aggressive posture. The scale of 
 aggression is directly associated with the level of assertiveness 
 contained by the request. Once you challenge anyone.... you have 
 initiated an aggressive posture.... no matter if it was based on self 
 assertion or dismissal due to mitigating factors. 
 
 You are still insisting that aggressive behaviour is only identified 
 through violent behaviour... and that is simply incorrect. A person can 
 be very aggressive without being physically violent. 
 
 CM 
 
 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 No..you're analogy is wrong....we're not talking about Reponses but 
 initial actions....responses are an entirely different matter...a 
 person can assertively request another to get them a cup of coffee...by 
 doing so, the other person,  responding to the assertiveness, does not 
 lose face, does not take on the role of servitude, retains some aspect 
 of equality or equanimity....a person aggressively requesting another 
 get them a cup of coffee negates the importance of that other person, 
 takes away their respect, and lowers their position in regards to 
 others... 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in message 
 news:1i3Zd.27317$i6.16694@edtnps90... 
 Not at all.... everyone has an opinion, that has nothing to do with 
 assertive behaviour. 
 The example of the dog is a poor one since you seem to think that 
 refusal to comply with a request is being assertive. Being assertive 
 is refusal to comply with direction or treatment that exceeds a 
 boundary you have established. Once that refusal is made... 
 aggressive behaviour is enacted, since the action of declining or 
 taking a stand requires it. 
 
 Let's use another example. If someone where to direct you to fetch 
 coffee... even if done politely,  compliance to that request is 
 dependent on several factors. Once you weigh the factors you make a 
 decision to comply or refuse. 
 
 Now, what I'm saying is that such direction would never be considered 
 nor even directed to an aggressive personality..... since 
 assertiveness goes hand in hand with aggressive behaviour the 
 "direction" would be quickly reconsidered and reduced to a "request". 
 A person who is non-aggressive or not assertive would be the primary 
 candidate for direction due to their perceived position in the pecking 
 order. To elevate yourself  in the pecking order requires you take a 
 stand... that action requires you to be aggressive. 
 
 While you may be assertive in presenting your point of view in this 
 matter... you have as well been aggressively defending your 
 misconceptions. 
 
 CM 
 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 To assert mean you have an opinion and are willing to stand by 
 it...that is not aggression....you really have been too far away from 
 civilization and for too long a time....your ideas have become warped 
 and distorted away from the common view....assertiveness is not 
 aggression...assertiveness is when the dog nudges you for a pat and 
 doesn't take No for an answer.but you can still walk 
 away...aggressiveness is when he finally grabs your hand with his 
 teeth and bites down to remind you that he is in control...and the 
 only way you can walk away is to fight back or allow him to win... 
 
 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in message 
 news:1OYYd.49077$fc4.21489@edtnps89... 
 Absolutely inaccurate assessment on your part Kitty. You seem to 
 assume aggressiveness as truculent behaviour....  that is 
 misleading. To assert is to take a stance....  that alone requires 
 you assume an aggressive posture. 
 
 The very action of being assertive requires that you are capable of 
 delineating how you will be treated or engaged. You are making a 
 demand of others....  that requires an aggressive posture.... unless 
 you are making a plea... which isn't assertive. 
 
 CM 
 
 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 Well, you're wrong again...I'm not interested in doing all the 
 Google searches for the studies, but they're there...assertiveness 
 can be taught and used effectively, without aggression....you 
 probably just don't recognize it because the testosterone stands in 
 the way... 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in message 
 news:IyNYd.23951$ZO2.4359@edtnps84... 
 Assertive behaviour is motivated by aggressive stance. If you 
 stand your ground... you are asserting your place... the very act 
 of that is aggressive. The meek can never be taught 
 assertiveness....  I don't care how many classes you give them.... 
 they will fold like superman on laundry day in the face of someone 
 with a true assertive/aggressive personality. 
 
 CM 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 You're wrong....there are people that specialize in training the 
 meek to be assertive...these people have not got an aggressive 
 bone in their bodies and get walked over....with assertiveness 
 training, they are able to start fending for themselves...has 
 nothing to do with aggression and everything to do with 
 survival.... 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in message 
 news:w6LYd.23554$ZO2.23116@edtnps84... 
 Again you fail to grasp the basic fact that without an 
 aggressive attitude... you cannot be assertive. Assertiveness is 
 merely a symptom of an aggressive nature, as is being 
 competitive. Aggression does not have to involve physical 
 violence. I believe you are unable to comprehend this because as 
 a female you are guided by emotion as opposed to logic. 
 
 CM 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 Assertiveness works well in the competitive field of business 
 whereas aggressiveness will usually land you on the 
 unemployment lines...aggressive people generally rise fast in 
 their professions and then tank out early whereas the 
 consistently assertive attain their goals in a non-threatening 
 manner and hold their positions or continue to rise.... 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in message 
 news:N_EYd.46434$fc4.26583@edtnps89... 
I believe it is indeed that you do not comprehend.... or make 
erroneous assumptions regarding male aggression. In the average 
male... aggressiveness is controlled. To submit that a 
competitive nature is not required in a modern society is 
illogical. Even the few women in a position of power show an 
extremely heightened sense of aggressiveness and a competitive 
nature. Enlightenment has nothing to do with it. 
 
 CM 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 It's not that we don't comprehend..it's that we reject that 
 as anything other than what it is....uncontrolled 
 testosterone...it worked for cavemen because that's the 
 physical reality they lived in but the idea of man (gender, 
 not species) as hunter/gatherer in an enlightened society is 
 an anachronism... 
 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in message 
 news:5huYd.20032$ZO2.7495@edtnps84... 
 NO! Kitty....  You are confusing aggressiveness and 
 assertiveness.... which is understandable. I will repeat 
 myself despite the fact I know you are not capable of 
 understanding the logic..... You cannot be assertive without 
 being aggressive. 
 
 Let's take the scenario you utilized....   you assume that 
 aggression requires physical intervention. It does not! 
 Aggression between males has a multi-tiered level.... none 
 of which can be comprehended by females. The level of 
 aggressive behaviour is dependant on the situation. This is 
 comprehended by even the youngest of our gender. 
 
 CM 
 
 
 
 CM 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 An assertive person makes their point by showing you the 
 hole in the ground; an aggressive person puts you in the 
 hole in the ground. 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in message 
 news:gXrYd.19227$ZO2.4609@edtnps84... 
 You require aggressiveness to be assertive....  the very 
 act of asserting yourself, places others as either your 
 equal or your subordinate.... despite what they may have 
 perceived. This situation is not attained by passive 
 compliance, nor neutral indifference. 
 
 CM 
 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in message 
 ... 
I am assertive....not aggressive.... 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in 
 message news:hTpYd.20694$i6.18071@edtnps90... 
 Aggression need not be physical.... 
 
 CM 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in 
 message 
 ... 
I am not a physically aggressive person....except for 
the boots, chains, spurs, etc....but that's not the same 
thing... 
 
 "Capt. Mooron"  wrote in 
 message news:xghYd.40369$fc4.33395@edtnps89... 
 You may indeed suggest it......  but I'd sooner you 
 take your own advise. 
 
 CM 
 
 "katysails"  wrote in 
 message 
 Well, may I suggest you rise above your base animal 
 instinct and start using the tools that were given 
 you to negotiate and walk away from aggression? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	
	 |