Dave wrote:
One should never confuse what can be done without violating the law with
what is right.


That's a funny thing for a lawyer to say.

But notice that I do not approve of, nor agree with, this particular
exercise of private property rights. Just noting that "conservatives"
attacking it are being rather two-faced.

If you're not willing to stand on your principles when it's
inconveneient or even costly, then you don't have any. And standing on
principle is one of the defining characteristics of a real conservative.

DSK