Scott Weiser wrote:
A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:

Scott:
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
If I want to sunbathe nude
beside the babbling brook, I should be able to do so without having
to
worry
about a bunch of boaters interrupting my ruminations and my tan.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

You'll hear nary a peep from me. In fact, I promise, I'll avert my
eyes. No! Correction! I will definitely NOT look!

A naked Weiser with a concealed weapon. WOW! Of course, if it's
cold
out, I can see the concealed bit. Or is this always an issue with
you,
Scott? GRIN

Well, on my own property, I have no need to conceal anything...


--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

=A9 2005 Scott Weiser

Hey Scott, all this talk about CCW, reminds me of a alarm installer
here in Denver, who walked around with a 44 mag in a very visible
holster. The PD tried to take it away from him, and even the DA took
him to court. The judge aquitted him of all charges of carrying a
weapon in general in the public sector. There were certain places such
as Gov bldg, especially courts, and Schools where he could not carry
it, but as long as it was not concealed, he could carry it pretty much
anywhere else, and did not require a CCW permit. This had the Denver PD
in a tissy for awhile, and I don't know how they finally settle the
situation.

So for those of you who have a problem with CCW's, that could be just
the tip of the iceberg if we were really so uncivilized down here in
the redneck states. I don't find most folks want to mess with the
inconvienence of a 44 mag. Besides, it messes up my figure! TnT