"Tinkerntom" wrote in message
oups.com...

KMAN wrote:
"Tinkerntom" wrote in message
ups.com...

KMAN wrote:
...snip...

So, would you describe yourself as an atheist, agnostic,
humanist?
Tnt

Just sane.

Please define sane, and do you have any evidence to back up your
statement that you qualify? big Grin TnT

No evidence that I qualify. I am not disqualified through belief in
an
invisible man.

As to any evidence whether any of us qualify or not is probably
fleeting at best, so I will not hold your feet to the fire on this one!

As to this invisible man that you keep talking about, that is mean,
short tempered, and judgemental; sounds to me like you have a pretty
clear vision of who he is, and of whom they are speaking! You are found
out in the retoric of your denial. The more you deny, the increased
basis of denial you must depend on that you don't believe. The more
noise of denial you make, indicates that you actually have something
that you believe you are wrestling with that must be denied.

Uhn?

If in fact you did not believe, you would not be threatened by this
non-existant invisible being

I'm not.

But whackos who talk about doing things because the invisible man tells them
to, now that scares me!

and would have nothing to deny. You could
actually go through life quite quietly, with nothing to prove to any
one about this invisible man that does not exist. But if you go through
life yelling at/or about this invisible man that does not exist, some
may doubt your sanity.

It's not me that raises the topic of the invisible man, Tinkerntom.

I sure hear a lot of noise, coming from your direction. TnT

?