Jim Donohue wrote:
The address is live...not good at email?
Funny thing -- it bounced back at me -- my address is good -- try it,
and lets do the infighting one on one. No need for you to continue to
show your ignorance to those who have already seen it.
And you are worried about dead
address with a yahoo for goodness sake.
You demonstrate exactly what I mean. You drag an OT rec.boat discussion to
cruising. We can discuss your bad manners here where it is acceptable
rather than on cruising where it is not.
BULL****! -- You admitted I did not post this discussion in
Rec.boats.cruising, (see below)and without bothering to read the full
discussion, chose to attack me on an unrelated topic.
I'll repeat my question
Are you trying to stir up trouble; confused; or maybe drinking?
Kind of early in the day for drinking.
I know that rec.boats has some jerks. but in my opinion, you just topped
them all!
"Jim," wrote in message
...
Jim Donohue wrote:
That is right...you did not publish this thread on Cruising. No one said
you did. You published another thread on cruising labeled OT with
idiotic advice not to let jerks like you lose on cruising. If you keep
your bull**** off cruising you won't hear from me...unless I agree or
disagree with your position on rec.boats. I don't respond to off topic
stuff on cruising so I came back here and picked the first jimcomma
thread.
You stay off cruising and I will freely stay off your thread.
Now don't start some silly rant about top posting. Just stay off
cruising with your bilge.
Jim Donohue
"Jim," wrote in message
...
Jim Donohue wrote:
Jim, do us all a favor...keep your bull**** off rec.boats.cruising. We
don't need it there nor want it there. Come on over when you want to
talk about cruising. But if it is OT keep it here were it is accepted.
OT posts cause infection...keep yourself quarantined please.
Jim Donohue
"Jim," wrote in message
...
HOMELAND SECURITY -- A TERRORIST'S RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS: According to a
congressional investigation by the nonpartisan Government
Accountability Office (GAO), "Dozens of terrorist suspects on federal
watch lists were allowed to buy firearms legally in the United States
last year (http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation...1_china08.html)
." Oops! Turns out the Bush administration, three years after 9/11,
simply hasn't gotten around to making it illegal for suspected
terrorists to buy guns. In fact, until February 2004, civil liberties
stalwart John Ashcroft --
who has advocated surveillance and wiretapping on U.S. citizens without
court approval -- actively resisted efforts to increase oversight for
terrorists seeking guns because of "Second Amendment concerns." The GAO
investigation indicated people "with clear links to terrorist groups
(http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/08/na...nt%26position=)
had taken advantage of this gap on a regular basis.... At least 44
times between February and June of 2004, people regarded by the FBI as
known or suspected members of terrorist groups sought permission to buy
or carry guns." In all but nine cases, permission was granted.
I did not post this to rec.boats.cruising. I just checked the original
post to be sure. additionally a search of rec.boats.cruising shows no
such topic.
Are you trying to stir up trouble; confused; or maybe drinking?
Suggest you follow a ways back in the thread "Some more dumb questions"
This afternoon it was beginning to look like rec.boats, and I posted my
message as a warning. One of the combatants agreed with me and promised
NOT to respond to off topic posts, others chose to take additional shots
at him, but he restrained himself nicely.
Perhaps if you knew what you were talking about before attacking me, you
might be more civil.
Which causes me to restate the question.
Are you trying to stir up trouble; confused; or maybe drinking?
My suggestion to you is take your bull**** and go home!