On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 06:44:09 -0500, Dave Hall wrote:

On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 21:30:27 -0500, John H
wrote:

On 8 Mar 2005 14:40:31 -0800, wrote:

John H wrote:

Chuck, would you call this name-calling?

************
As I said, that type of behavior is "down significantly".

Do you disagree?

Chuck, would you call this name-calling?

"As for my influence, of course you reject intelligent & factual input,
that's why you're a member of the Krause-obessed fascist whacko clique."

That's from Doug Kanter, one of the folks you mentioned in the post you snipped.

Or,

"Actually, she always HAS been. But, since she doesn't fit the Cosmo model
image, she doesn't garner favor with children like JimH."


from the same.

This was from one on your 'good guy' list. Is the question unanswerable?

The answer to yours is yes. But, the slope of the line tangent to the
name-calling per day frequency curve is definitely positive.


You have to understand the double standard. When the "right"
criticizes someone, it's "hate filled rhetoric", but when the "left"
criticizes someone, it's "an expression of their first amendment
right to an alternative viewpoint."


Dave

Ah. I stand informed. Thanks.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."