On 8-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

They define their own textbook definition. Their scientific credentials
are not in question.

Well, since you haven't yet identified a single "scientist" in any credible
manner that would permit examination of their credentials, I judge this to
be argument by authority.

What a crock of ****. Scientists use their own terminology and don't need
your approval. Get over it.

Then feel free to post an authoritative and verifiable definition of

You're still short quite a few references for the crap you claim to
be true. When you catch up, get back to me.

some references are
required because you are facile at mischaracterizing things.

Trying to accuse me of what you do? That's rich. More bull****
from the weiner.

Mike