On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:06:49 -0500, DSK wrote:

Fits wrote:
Accepting the guvmint check returning the money that has essentially
been
stolen from you every year of your working life....more or less at gun
point.......does NOT negate the complaint against socialism.......

Sure it does.

Accepting a Social Security benefits check... which is socialism...
while complaining about socialism, especially saying that socialists
ought to be killed... is just outright hypocrisy.

Hey Bert Robo-tard, if you want to kill a Socialist maybe you should
start with P.Fritz?

... AND
'proceeds'...........a 2% return on the stolen money....and chuck wants
to
call it proceeds?

You're right, it's not "proceeds", it's money taken from those that are
currently wo
rking. You are confusing Social Security with an investment
plan.


wrote:
Today's standard: "Socialism is OK when it directly benefits me. I will
justify my suck on the government teat by pointing out that I was
forced, through taxation, to contribute to the government
during my working years and that because I am special I now deserve to
get my money back. Socialism in not OK when it benefits somebody else.
The only good Socialist is a dead socialist, but hands off the
socialist who signs the monthly check for my little piece of the
socialist security system, please."


Too many words, Chuck.

DSK


I would have been much happier putting my FICA into a plan of my choice. The
government picked the plan I had to use. The fact that I get back money that I
put in sure doesn't make me a socialist.

But, if your idea of socialism is accepting a social security check, what do you
call liberals who do so? Extremist Socialists?

Wow!


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."