|
|
|
|
"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...
"KMAN" wrote in message
.. .
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article t, rick at
wrote on 3/6/05 11:08 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/6/05 9:12 PM:
snip..
as stupid and ignorant as
ever, but
it's not your fault I didn't work the question very well. So,
unlike you, I
did not take the scumbag route and refuse to apologize.
==================
LOL No, you dishonestly took the route of apologizing to
soembody else, not to me.
It was an apology to you, but apparently you were confused
about that.
===================
LOL In a post to somebody else, and never addressing me. OK, if
that's your definition of an honest apology, so be it, liarman.
You still seem to be claiming that no one dies waiting for
treatment though.
It could happen in any health care system. When my wife got sick in
Miami
with kidney stones and was writhing in agony with an as yet undiagnosed
problem, she was initially refused treatment because the administrator
could
not get through on the phone to the insurance company.
I haven't seen any evidence that makes me long for a different type of
health care system. Every Canadian knows that there are problems with
certain types of specialized tests and providing service to remote
areas. We
all want to improve those situations and there is a national will to do
so.
============================
Willful ignorance.
Will to do better. Ignorance infers not knowing about the problems
involved, and I do.
snip tired old crap
You, on the other hand, have made a deliberate false
accusation.
================
No, I have not.
You claimed
that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. I
never
said that.
You are a liar and a scumbag and a coward for continuing to
insist that I
did.
=====================\\\
Yes, you did, and I showed you where and how, liarman
You showed part of a quote where I said "No one is waiting for
treatment"
which was a response to your babble about a particular group of
people in
Newfoundland.
======================
that's what you claimed, liarman.
I have not lied about anything.
This is the only reference you have made in support of your false
accusation:
====
in article , KMAN at
wrote on 2/20/05 2:14 PM:
in article t, rick
at
wrote on 2/20/05 1:18 PM:
Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years
for treatment.
No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in
a
specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies.
====
As we've already reviewed a dozen times, in the above I'm responding to
your
interpretation of the article about Newfoundland and your assertion
that the
people in the story were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Whether you
agree with what I said or not (and what I said is supported by one of
the
doctors quoted in the article) clearly I am not making a statement that
no
one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment.
======================
No, fool. That post was prior to this one. This one is about your
ignorant claims that because a poor person in the US may not be able to
get to the doctor right away, then they are 'waiting' for treatment. I
pointed out that it wasn't the convenience of the system that is making
them wait, as in Canada, but their own. You then proceeded to claim that
NO one is waiting for treatment in Canada.
Where did I say that? Quit being so obscure. If I said "no one is waiting
for treatment in Canada" post that quote with the full context so it can
be explored.
=========================
LOL YOU just posted the context fool.
Oh, I see, so you are only referring to the discussion about Newfoundland.
Thanks for finally confirming that this is all about your being a scumbag
and liar and deliberately making a false accusation and being unwilling to
admit it.
|